Is ending rich results the same as invalidating the schema?

No. Rich results are the visual display in search results (stars, prices, expandable questions), while schema is metadata that helps machines understand what content means — the two are independent.

Should I switch from FAQPage to QAPage?

QAPage is for community Q&A pages where users submit their own answers. For a standard FAQ page you write yourself, FAQPage is still the correct type.

Does FAQ schema affect search rankings?

No, structured data is not a ranking signal. It can, however, help AI search find and cite the relevant Q&A content more accurately.

Google discontinued FAQ rich results—should I still use FAQ schema?

Google ended FAQ rich results display on May 7, 2026. FAQPage schema itself remains valid in schema.org, though, and AI search engines still read and cite Q&A structure. If your goal is AI optimization rather than a visual rich result, FAQ schema is still worth keeping.

Updated 2026-07-07

Frequently asked questions

Google discontinued FAQ rich results—should I still use FAQ schema?: Google Search's visual FAQ rich result is gone, but FAQPage schema is still a valid schema.org type, and AI search engines still read and cite Q&A structure from it.
Is ending rich results the same as invalidating the schema?: No. Rich results are the visual display in search results (stars, prices, expandable questions), while schema is metadata that helps machines understand what content means — the two are independent.
Should I switch from FAQPage to QAPage?: QAPage is for community Q&A pages where users submit their own answers. For a standard FAQ page you write yourself, FAQPage is still the correct type.
Does FAQ schema affect search rankings?: No, structured data is not a ranking signal. It can, however, help AI search find and cite the relevant Q&A content more accurately.